Go to content Go to navigation Go to search

Sunday, July 20, 2008 | Archives

December 6, 2007

Teens bound over in beheading case

Click image to enlarge

Jean Pierre ‘JP’ Orlewicz, with attorney James Thompson, listens to the testimony against him and Alexander Letkemman on Friday.

“Stay strong,” family members told Alex Letkemann Friday afternoon as he was led out of a courtroom at the 35th District Court in Plymouth. “We love you.”

They filled the benches , their wrists decorated with beaded bracelets that spelled out ‘Alex,’ bordered by tiny ceramic hearts.

The Letkemanns learned their battle to clear the name of their 18-year-old son was not yet over. He and 17-year-old Jean Pierre Orlewicz of Plymouth were bound over for trial on charges of first degree murder and mutilation of a corpse following the death of Daniel Sorensen, a 26-year-old River Rouge man earlier this month. A third charge, of felony murder, was dropped because Judge Mike Gerou said Friday there was not probable cause.

Letkemann and Orlewicz face an arraignment on information on Dec. 14 at the Frank Murphy Hall of Justice in Detroit.

The ruling came after about six hours of testimony at the preliminary examination on Friday that included a reading of a sworn statement from Letkemann as well as a video of a conversation between him and Canton detectives Mike Steckel and Sgt. Rick Pomorski.

Raymond Cassar, Letkemann’s attorney, tried to get the statement stricken because the Westland teen had been read his Miranda rights nearly 20 hours before he made the statement.

Assistant Wayne County Prosecutor Robert Moran argued, though, that they were still in effect and Letkemann was aware of them.

“There’s no requirement in law that someone has to be re-advised of their Miranda rights,” he said. “Once they’ve been read, they’re sufficient.”

Gerou agreed.

In his statement—which Steckel read into the record—Letkemann told police he was surprised that Orlewicz carried out the deed. He said it had been initially planned for Nov. 7. Orlewicz called it of after Sorensen was dropped off at the home, according to testimony. He then planned the crime for the following day.

“I was expecting him to call it off,” Letkemann told police, adding that he didn’t have time to stop the attack that claimed Sorenson’s life. “I couldn’t react. It knocked the wind out of me.”

According to additional testimony, Orlewicz lured Sorenson to a home in Canton Township to allegedly extort money from another teen, named Adam. A tarp had been laid on the floor of the garage and cleaning supplies were nearby. Sorenson’s throat was cut from behind and he was stabbed 13 times, according to a report from the Wayne County Coroner’s office. His head was sawed off after he was killed, the report added.

“I don’t know why he killed him,” Letkemann told police in the video. “I don’t know why he had it out so bad for that guy.”

He said he helped clean up the mess and dump the body because he feared for his own life.

A third teen, Isam Ayyash, 17, of Livonia, was granted immunity for his testimony. He said he was called to help lift the body into the truck . He said he was shocked when he arrived and saw the body wrapped in the tarp.

“I asked if it was a joke and they said ‘no’,” Ayyash testified. He helped move the body and then gave Orlewicz his clothes because the other teen’s were bloody, he said. He then left the scene wearing boxer shorts and a sweatshirt.

Steckel testified that Letkemann was cooperative throughout the process. He said he was the one that took police to an area of Hines Drive near Outer Drive where they recovered the victim’s head.

Cassar argued that there was enough evidence that Letkemann helped in the crime.

“There’s been nothing to show my client offered aid or encouragement,” he said. “If he’s done anything, it was as an accessory after the fact. There has been no testimony that my client participated in anything.”

Moran said the fact that he returned gave probable cause that he helped commit the murder, though.

“If he didn’t go back the second day, there’s no crime,” he said. “But he went back.”

http://www.journalgroup.com/Canton/6521

Join the Discussion

Reader comments [4]

Apr 27, 2008 | 12:49 AM
Rob R:

Holy smoke, the defense that would have let Alex Letkemann walk was right in this story. He said it clearly that he didn’t really think JP would really kill the victim and then he said that when it was done, the wind was knocked out of him and he was unable to repsond. We know he got sick outside the garage not once but twice. The first time was when he actually witnessed the crime. The overwhelming smell of blood and death in that garage, coupled with the teen’s horror at seeing another person killed so bruatlly, made him go outside and vomit. Alex also vomitted when the court took the jury and Alex and JP back to the garage crime scene during the trial. His reaction to seeing that place again made him sick again. I think it was a terrible memory and sensory repsonse to his horror.
My goodness, where was his attorney when this so-called deal was made. In exchange for truthful testimony he would serve 20 – 30 years? You know, all his friends are saying they believe Alex was innocent of the muder charges. I agree with them. He was clearly not the monster JP turned out to be. How can he sit there and recount this story sounding like he was at the Taco Bell drive through window. Speaking of which, when he testified about the trip to Taco Bell, Alex admitted that he couldn’t eat, but that JP ate his food.
I wish there was a way to reverse the deal and the court’s ruling so that this young man can return and finish school then make a life for himself. Alex Mullins and Ayyash I think his name is, walked away because they weren’t there when the killing took place. Alex wasn’t really there either. When it happened he was so horrified he couldn’t even speak. The prosecutor said he was playing with his hair, but JP even testified that he did the killing alone and Alex was “like a deer in the headlights” pulling his hair and freaking out. He clearly couldn’t believe what he was seeing. I completely agree with his story and I think he should never have been offered the plea deal because he would have testified truthfully anyway and he could have walked if his lawyer had just made his case for him. I am frustrated by this conclusion to the story. I wish there was a way to change this outcome for the teen who made an admittedly bad judgement call but had nothing to do with the murder itself.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Apr 29, 2008 | 2:37 PM
RAK:

I’m glad you’re not in charge. I wouldn’t want this idiot living anywhere near me. Life in prison or the death penalty would have been more appropriate. How hard is it to go through life and not be in a garage at a time when your friend is committing a violent murder? It’s not like this was spontaneous. It was planned and he was aware of it. Your way of thinking just makes excuses for people not taking responsibility for their actions. Telling the police after you’ve been caught does not “make it right”. Everyone of those kids involved should have done time. I suggest you pick a more suitable person to feel sorry for…

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
May 13, 2008 | 5:52 PM
Concerned:

Rob R, I think that is a very dangerous way of thinking and I agree with RAK’s comment. People need to be held accountable for their actions and Alex, Isam and the other Alex were all accessories.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
May 14, 2008 | 9:44 PM
Suzy-Q:

Are you kidding Rob R? Alex is right where he needs to be. Now the people of his town can sleep knowing he and JP are off the streets. Since I am in LA I have not seen all of the local coverage others have and maybe there are things I don’t know but I watched the trial and his description of what happened with no show of emotion shows what kind of person he is. No person of sound mind would have just stood there and watched. Yes he came forward and snitched on JP but he did it to save his skin. Remember he did lie to the fuzz five times before finally spilling his guts and telling the truth. If nothing else, his choice of JP as a friend is a mistake he will regret for eternity. I will say he is a very loved young man by his obviously caring parents and large circle of friends which also shows what kind of person he could be. This was more than an “error or judgement” and he must be held accountable, just like the get away driver in a bank robbery. They weren’t in the bank but they knew about it and participated to an extent. He and JP will have a long time to talk about this for decades to come. The Sorensens showed incredible strength and class throughout this whole horrible story.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
New! Talk about more issues in Journal Talk.
Canton Eagle

Comments (4)

Printer-Friendly

Text Size: A A A A

Contact Us

35540 Michigan Ave.
Wayne, MI 48184

(734) 467-1900


Community event coming up?

List it free!

Communities All Areas Services & Extras About Us