Go to content Go to navigation Go to search
Associated Online

Friday, September 3, 2010 | Archives

October 23, 2008

Officer files lawsuit

Attorneys for a veteran police lieutenant filed a Whistleblower’s lawsuit against the Inkster Police Department and city administration.

The lawsuit, filed by attorneys for Lt. Kevin Smith, 55, alleges he was demoted for testifying at federal court in 2007 regarding improper conduct by city officials in a reverse racial discrimination case, and for probing the viability of towing contract. The suit was filed at Wayne County Circuit Court three weeks ago.

An additional case filed in federal court by Smith’s attorneys also alleged the city violated Smith’s civil rights by removing him from his position without cause, according to court documents.

“Lt. Smith has been unjustly punished for exercising his first amendment rights,” said attorney Paul Broschay, of the firm Fieger, Fieger, Kenney, Johnson & Schwartz.

“He has been shunned by the department’s leadership ever since he testified in a case that resulted in a judgment against the city, and he’s spoken out about other problems in the department,” he added. “There’s been an effort (by police administrators) to undermine Lt. Smith’s command.”

Named in the lawsuit are City Manager Joyce Parker, Police Chief Greg Gaskin and Deputy Police Chief Dennis Watkins.

Unexpected removal
Smith was the detective lieutenant – a position that is typically third in command for the department – for five years. On June 18, Smith was informed that the detective lieutenant position was to be turned into a rotating position.

Another lieutenant, Jeff Smith (no relation), was told three weeks prior to Kevin Smith’s removal that he would be installed in the position, and was told to keep the fact a secret, according to union sources.

The position had never rotated before in the history of the department, said Lt. Tom Diaz, the president of the Inkster Command Officers Association.

“The question I immediately asked myself about all of this was if all of this was on the up and up, why in the world would (Gaskin) ask the current DB (detective bureau) lieutenant to keep this a secret?” Diaz said.

“Every other person who has occupied this position has been allowed to maintain it,” he added.

Diaz said city negotiators made no attempt to make the detective lieutenant position into a rotating position during union talks last year.

Gaskin, in a communication with officers, said the position was being rotated for training purposes.

Smith’s removal also came weeks after he questioned why the city apparently wanted to bypass working with a towing company called Cherry Hill Motorsports, which had been hired to tow vehicles for the detective bureau, but was later sidelined by council members. The owners of the two other towing companies seeking work with the city are alleged to have personal ties to some city council members.

Also, in February 2007, Smith was one of a handful of witnesses who testified in federal court in a racial discrimination suit filed by Diaz.

In that suit, Diaz alleged that preferential treatment was given black applicants in terms of hiring and promotions. A jury sided with Diaz and awarded him $253,000 plus attorney’s fees and interest on the claim.

The trial also ended the career of former Deputy Chief Gregory Hill, who was revealed to have lied under oath about having a college degree.

Broschay said a review of the Diaz case shows the city’s legal strategy was to blame Smith for the circumstances that led to that case.

In 2005, Smith survived a removal attempt, after he ordered an investigation on then council candidate Michael Canty for illegally teaching gun courses in the city.

Canty was eventually elected, and called for Smith to be removed.
Smith also was denied repeated requests for detective training and personnel that were granted after he was removed.

Diaz said the timing of the removal raised questions.

“Why did the idea for the detective lieutenant’s position to become a revolving one only come up after the situation with the towing contract came up?” he asked.

A long career
Smith has been an Inkster police officer since October 1995. After two years on patrol, then-Police Chief Terry Colwell assigned Smith to the multi-community Metro Street Enforcement Team.

As part of that unit, Smith led a comprehensive undercover sting that shut down the X-rated Melody Theater, and brought in a $1 million forfeiture, which was split with three other municipalities, according to the legal complaint.

Colwell – who promoted Smith twice – said Monday that he felt Smith went above and beyond the call of duty for the city.

“I thought he was a person that worked hard and had a high level of personal integrity,” he said. “I trusted him implicitly as part of the special unit. I thought he showed a lot of promise as a command officer.”

Former Chief Phil Ludos, who also promoted Smith twice before leaving the department in 2003, agreed.

“I promoted him because his level of experience in the special unit, and because we had some issues — like financial problems — that I felt he could resolve,” he said. “We needed to make some changes, and he was able to make the (detective bureau) more productive. We also needed to rebuild the department’s reputation, and I think (Smith) helped us achieve that.”

Smith created a homicide unit after his promotion to detective lieutenant that improved solve rates to nearly 90 percent – higher than the previous city record and the national average of 66 percent, according to the legal filings.

In 1998, Smith had the opportunity to represent the department on a statewide stage when he testified about he negative effect of adult-oriented businesses in Inkster at a hearing of the State House of Representatives.

City response
Parker — who will vacate her position as city manager shortly — said she could not specifically speak about pending litigation.

She did say that the union and city had a miscommunication about her order to hold off on the officer transfers, and denied wrongdoing in general.

Parker said she hoped to have a resolution to the union grievances and the litigation before she leaves her position, but that likely won’t occur.

Gaskin and Watkins did not immediately return calls seeking comment about the case earlier this week. Michael Crow, the city’s liability attorney, also did not return calls seeking comment.

Changes that occurred as a result of the personnel moves have resulted in resignations from two officers and more than one grievance the city must resolve with the unions or take to binding arbitration, sources close to the situation reported.

The lawsuit Smith filed will likely be amended to name additional city administrators and elected council persons, Broschay said.
Smith, when contacted about the lawsuit, declined to comment and referred all questions to Broschay, who said the city has made no effort to clean up management practices that brought it to the courtroom to 2007.

“He’s had a distinguished career by anyone’s measure,” added Broschay.

“Lt. Smith is a long-term employee of the police department who’s worked hard for many years fighting crime in the service of the city,” Broschay added.

http://www.journalgroup.com/Inkster/8635

Join the Discussion

Reader comments [10]

Oct 23, 2008 | 4:43 PM
Michael A. Canty:

Once again, the local newspaper has shown its bias and lack of knowledge of the facts. I never had any words with Smith or anyone else about removing him or transferring him anywhere in the department. I challenge the newspaper or anyone else prove otherwise. The statement is untrue and libelous.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Oct 23, 2008 | 10:37 PM
Alma Joyner:

What is happening in our city? This officer is what we need to keep us safe, shame on you city council and chief of police. It sounds like the same as the city of Detroit, and what an embarassment that is. Shame on you!

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Oct 24, 2008 | 11:06 AM
R. Williams:

Mr. Canty it sounds like you’ll get your opportunity in the court of law to tell your side…are you sure you’re ready for that???

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Oct 24, 2008 | 1:28 PM
Michael A. Canty:

It is interesting to note that no listing for “Alma Joyner” could be found in the City of Inkster. No listing could be found in the State of Michigan. There is no registered tax payer in Inkster named “Alma Joyner”. There is no registered voter in Inkster named “Alma Joyner”. There is no registered voter in the State of Michigan named “Alma Joyner”. There aren’t even any public records in the State of Michigan with such a name. To the writer; yes it is shameful alright. And people who are familiar with local politics around here know right where that shame belongs.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Oct 24, 2008 | 9:43 PM
Thomas Diaz:

Mr. Canty, First I feel that the Leger Star was referring to your last attempt to remove Lt. Smith and not this current embarrassment. It is well known by Lt. Smith, and his attorneys, who is involved in this latest outrage and as the article said the suit will be amended to add those names. Although the Union would be happy to furnish you with a copy of the tape recording of the council meeting where YOU called for Lt. Kevin Smith’s removal from office (Luckily no one was listening) And why? Because YOU taught gun classes illegally and got caught. Lt. Smith did his job and you didn’t like it ( you later pled no contest remember?). Also when you ran for the council you kept saying over and over that YOU were “instrumental” in the closing of the Melody theater. The Ledger Star then exposed you as a fraud as a check of the facts showed you had nothing to do with its closing.
Lt. Kevin Smith has done more to improve this city and department than anyone else I know. He has been constantly hounded by those who like you only wish they could have achieved as much. Lt. Smith could have sued after your attempt to remove him but chose not to. Lt. Smith could have sued when then Chief Winkler tried to remove him but again he didn’t. I guess the third time was the charm. No shame here. Look me up I am real easy to find. Lt. Tom Diaz, C.O.A.M. President

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Oct 25, 2008 | 11:07 AM
Factman:

Please tell me you did not just search records to find information about a person who wrote about you on the internet. Isn’t there a more constructive use of your time than to show your paranoia by frantically searching for information about a person exercising her first amendment rights? I hope no one asks how you searched for this information, or if you used city resources…

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Oct 27, 2008 | 12:01 PM
Courtney J. Owens:

First let me begin by saying that it is sad that the city is again named in a lawsuit that could potentially cost thousands of tax-payer dollars. To my friend Lt. Diaz whom I’ve known for a number of years and RESPECT for his FAIRNESS and to my council colleague, Mr. Canty, with this recent revelation of some plea arrangement, it should be duly noted that you BOTH are well aware of how the legal system works. This startling revelation leads me as a member of council to question the integrity of more than the obvious. When we are attempting to restore the integrity of gov’t at all levels, but most importantly at a local level here in INKSTER, this is startling. I ask each of you, however, let’s let the lawyers and the judicial system handle this…let’s not try this case in the papers. Let each officers continue to do the fine jobs that they have been doing without distraction and, likewise, allow the elected officials, for the time being, continue to serve in the best interest of the people. In the end it will be the facts that have to be decided by the jury. The sad thing is, more than anything else, it’s the people of the City of Inkster who will suffer the negative impacts of a trial such as this that will add more negativity to our already-tattered image.
For the record Ms. Joyner, Mayor/Council have NOTHING to do with the day-to-day operations of the city. We are not like DETROIT.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Oct 27, 2008 | 4:35 PM
WHAT IS UP WITH INKSTER POLICE:

I WISH ALL THE CAT FIGHTING WOULD STOP IN THE CITY OF INKSTER. IF THE CITY AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT PULLED TOGETHER AS A WHOLE MAYBE, JUST MAYBE WE CAN SOLVE SOME OF THESE MURDERS.

AND LET’S NOT FORGET HOW GREG HILL LEFT THE POLICE FORCE, BUT HE IS BACK WORKING FOR THE CITY, IN THE COURTS. THE SHAME SHOULD BE IN ALL THE CASES THAT HE MIGHT OF LIED, JUST TO WIN A CASE.

SHOULD I NOW BE IN HIDING, BECAUSE THE POLICE ARE GOING TO GET ME. WE MIGHT AS WELL BE BACK IN SLAVERY DAYS.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Oct 28, 2008 | 12:44 PM
Terrel M. LeCesne:

Mr. Canty, just because you couldn’t locate the writer doesn’t mean the person doesn’t exist. Haven’t you heard of pseudonyms? It’s a name that is not the writer’s real name and is often used by authors. It’s done all the time.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Oct 30, 2008 | 2:11 AM
A Concerned Citizen:

Kudo’s to Councilperson Courtney Owens for standing up and asking questions and to Lt Tom Diaz as Police Union President. He must get tired of people taking pot shots at him and other dedicated personnel.

Let us not loose sight of the real issue… it has nothing to do that things happened and that they were well documented, the issue at hand is Chief Gaskin removed Lt Kevin Smith from a position that by all accounts performed better than any previous detective bureau chiefs.

For years we have read how he transformed the detective bureau, started the departments first dedicated homicide section with the results being the most homicides solved in the City of Inkster’s history, and the lowest number of homicides in 25 years. Why on earth would anyone even consider removing such a successful leader?

Councilperson Owens rightly states that we should let each officer continue to do their fine job without distraction. So then why was Lt Kevin Smith not allowed to continue?

Maybe Councilperson Owens should look into what is really going on within the police department.

After reading Councilperson Michael Canty’s response to “Alma Joyner” comments, it is no wonder why people do not want to use there real name.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
New! Talk about more issues in Journal Talk.
Communities All Areas Services & Extras About Us
VR Metro - Website Design, Development, Promotion, Hosting and Consulting Company