Response prompts rebuttal
To the editor:
I am responding to Councilman Mulholland’s response of my letter from July 8th. Here is Mulholland once again spinning the story. I spoke with another councilperson and a member of the administration, and they were shocked at his asking for Mr. Nicholson’s books. If Mulholland’s intention was to help him find ways to turn a profit, why didn’t he say so at the meeting? My belief is that after looking back at his comments, Mulholland realized he made a huge mistake and is now trying to cover it up by spinning things around.
As for council being anti-business and pro fee, all you have to do is look back at last Tuesday’s council meeting where council is looking at a new way to limit entertainment in the city. A business owner wants to have a comedy club in town, but council’s proposal will not allow more than 12 shows a year. It’s a comedy club! Look at how many of them exist in the region! Is this group that out of touch with reality?
Remember, November. 2011, vote out all of the anti-business pro fee incumbents, especially Mulholland.
Keith Butkovich,
Wayne

Feeds
