Go to content Go to navigation Go to search

Saturday, May 17, 2008 | Archives

July 26, 2007

Smoking ban gets boost

The fight between smokers, non-smokers and their supporters is set to begin.

By a 12-4 vote, a committee in the Michigan State House approved a bill that would essentially ban smoking in all workplaces including restaurants, bars and casinos in the state. The bill is expected to go to the entire House for consideration within the next several weeks.

If politicians in Lansing are successful in passing a law prohibiting smoking in public establishments, Plymouth business owner John O’Callaghan has a proposition for them.

“They can go ahead and pay me for my (smoke purification system) and they can use it as an anchor,” said the owner of Sean O’Callaghan’s Irish Public House.

O’Callaghan, who also owns restaurants in Livingston and Oakland counties said he has invested more than $2,500 in an air purification system to eliminate the sight and smell of smoke from his bar and restaurant and does not appreciate any effort from the state to tell him how to run his restaurants. He said that smoking is only allowed at the bar area in his establishments.

“It’s another example of government intrusion. The decision to allow smokers should be left to the will of the business owner,” O’Callaghan said.

The Michigan State Restaurant Owners Association along with the Michigan License Beverage Association has announced plans to run a counter campaign to push back on the proposed mandated ban.

According to their figures, thousands of restaurants across the state have made the decision to completely ban or limit smoking to one area without a state law.

Proponents of the bill, including the Michigan Chapter of the American Cancer Society, said the voluntary restrictions do not do enough to protect employees and patrons from second-hand smoke.

The issue is particularly important to western Wayne County communities just as many rely on their bars, restaurants and other public establishments as a reliable form of commerce and to spur activity for merchants and other businesses, said Fran Toney, the executive director of the Plymouth Community Chamber of Commerce.

Toney said she remembers the meetings within the community when Wayne County considered a similar ban.

“There was a lot of activity and concern and not just from the restaurant owners,” said Toney. “Our industrialists in Plymouth Township were particularly concerned because of the number of employees. This could hurt our area,” she said.

Andrea Skupski of Plymouth said smoking should be allowed in bars but not necessarily in family-type restaurants.

“People like to smoke in a bar and its one of the few places around as it is where you can smoke freely,” she said.

John Kohler, the manager of Plaza Lanes in Plymouth Township said their establishment already monitors smoking on the lanes and doesn’t expect the bill, if passed, to have a major impact on his business.

“If every business in the state is required to do it then we’re all even. It probably wouldn’t mean anything to business,” he said.

http://www.journalgroup.com/Plymouth/5415

Join the Discussion

Reader comments [3]

Jul 26, 2007 | 1:24 PM
Jim Bob:

Oh, how sad, a restaurant owner spent $2,500 on a purification system and this ban means he won’t get to use his investment any more. Wow, I really feel for this guy. There is nothing worse than a ban that means he won’t have to spend more money on electricity, or money on repair bills and maintenance contracts. Clearly this man deserves to use his purification system and waste more resources and money to clean up a voluntary toxin in the air that kills people.

Please, for the love of all things good in this world, don’t let this man’s investment and on-going costs come to an end. Please keep smoking around. In fact, maybe we can put together more legislation that provides for more toxins in the air so he can even install a second purification unit. That is really the only right and just thing to do.

While we’re at it, can we please mandate that the exhaust gases from cars be pumped directly into the cab so we can ALL purchase purification units? I too would like to join this restaurant owners cause, but since I don’t smoke, I need some other toxin like automobile gas that I can try to purify.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Jul 26, 2007 | 9:13 PM
C. Herron:

Jim Bob-
Please, for the love of all good things in this world, don’t try to undermine free enterprise and choice. This country was founded on the rights of individuals, not the tyranny of the majority. Your comment is quite mean spirited toward that business owner’s investment to keep his business afloat. Would you, in all your self righteous smugness, like to see him and other small business owners fail so you can have things your way?

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Aug 7, 2007 | 7:47 PM
Annonymous non-smoker:

I avoid restaurants and bars with heavy smoke. I refuse to expose myself to this poison and resent that my rights to remain healthy are violated daily with such lame arguments. Non-smokers and restaurant employees have the same rights as mentioned above. It is a scientific FACT that smoking causes a plethora of diseases, including DEATH. Restaurants and bars LOSE business because of heavy smoke. I hope the bill passes as I am sure that many other people will gladly go out more often with the smoking ban in place. As a former resident of California, this same smoking ban was passed in that state and business increased tremendously, as it has in many other states. Check the statistics for yourself. Even Kentucky, with one of the highest percentages of smoking, recently passes a no-smoking ban!! It’s time for Mighigan to join the 21st century. If it is that important for you to light up and impair your health, then do so elsewhere, and smoke to your heart’s (or lack of heart function!) content.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
New! Talk about more issues in Journal Talk.
Communities All Areas Services & Extras About Us