Go to content Go to navigation Go to search

Sunday, July 20, 2008 | Archives

March 6, 2008

Pet owner groups protest breed ban

Two weeks before Plymouth City Attorney Bob Marzano is expected to give his legal opinion about a proposed ordinance banning the ownership of pit bulls in Plymouth, dog-owner’s rights advocates had their say Monday.

During the public comments portion of the city commission bi-weekly public meeting, several opponents of the ordinance, suggested by a citizen petition to the commission, asked commissioners to carefully consider any attempt at creating legislation that singles out one particular breed of animal.

“It’s a very emotional issue…. once you pick a particular group, you run into big problems,” said Joe Petre, an eight-year resident of Plymouth who along with his wife, created A Voice for Pits, a blog website that opposes breed specific legislation or laws that ban or govern particular breeds of animals differently from others.

Petre’s comments to the commission were in response to a petition filed by Chris and Maureen Schneider of Jenner Street last month with more than a 100 signatures calling for the elimination of pit bulls and other animals bred for fighting within city limits.

The Schneiders started the petition after Kyle Kosmyna moved into the neighborhood with a 2-year-old pit bull on Feb. 12.

Petre said he is not advocating for Kosmyna’s ability as a dog owner but to protect the rights of Plymouth residents to own any domesticated animal of their choosing, provided they are abiding by local and state laws for animal safety. Petre said he has no objection to the second petition filed by the Schneiders calling for ordinances to strengthen guidelines for all dog owners in the municipality.

“We’re more concerned with responsible dog ownership,” Petre said.

Don Barden, of the Michigan Association for Pure Bred Dogs and a legislative liaison for the American Kennel Club, told commissioners his organization “strongly opposes legislation that determines a dog to be dangerous based on specific breeds or phenotypic classes of dogs.”

“(Legislation) would come under serious Constitutional questions,” said Barden who has worked with municipalities throughout southeastern Michigan with ordinances to protect both the safety of residents and the rights of dog-owners.

Barden, who spent at least 30 minutes talking to several Plymouth residents in favor of the pit bull ban said “common ground” could be reached.

“I believe that everyone that participated in that discussion came away from it realizing that there was a lot of common ground among the members of the discussion. That common ground focused on developing an enforceable animal control ordinance; one that is equitable among all dog owners and promotes responsible dog/animal ownership,” said Barden. “In my opinion, everyone was on the same page, albeit on opposite margins.”

Plymouth Mayor Phil Pursell said he has been inundated with information from ban supporters and opponents since the petitions were filed. Pursell said the city is in the national spotlight because of the issue.

“Iowa, California, Texas, I’ve never had as much information sent to me from people all over the country in my life,” he added.

Marzano is scheduled to give his report on the ordinance during the Plymouth City Commission meeting that begins at 7 p.m. March 17. The meeting will be at Plymouth City Hall located on 201.S. Main St.

http://www.journalgroup.com/Plymouth/7150

Join the Discussion

Reader comments [6]

Mar 6, 2008 | 7:56 PM
Ray:

We have experienced BSL 2 years ago in Australia-Pitbulls were banned. Nothing has changed statistically, people still being bitten/occasionally dying from other breeds dogs attacked etc but the media now generally choose not to report incidents. Huge waste of money – impossible to enforce. Interestingly in AU the breed was banned without a single death being attributed pit bulls.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Mar 10, 2008 | 1:14 PM
Councilman Owens:

We recently addressed this issue in Inkster and after much heated debate, we decided to eforce the dangerous dog ordinance that was already on the books. As a councilperson, who happens to own a pitbull, I also own a Cane Corso which is larger and a lot more people aggressive than any pit that I have ever owned, 7 to date. You would be taking steps backward by enacting BSL. A dangerous dog is a dangerous dog..85lb Giant Schnauzer or 35lb Pit.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Mar 16, 2008 | 11:05 PM
Lisa:

Aggressive dogs are like people, they come in all shapes, sizes, and colors. Mine was a 35lb black terrier. He bit, was territorial, and got the boot. His replacement (same breed) might kill too, by licking you to death.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Mar 30, 2008 | 10:01 PM
rosie:

It is pretty pathetic that someone would try to single out a single breed as more dangerous than another. Dog ownership is a reponsibility and dog owners should be held responsible. End of story.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Apr 5, 2008 | 8:24 AM
Ms. Stanley:

It’s unfortunate that pit’s are singled out, however, in Inkster they and rotts are the breed of choice for illegal dog fighting. There have been and continue to be dog fighting rings, enough so that addressing this issue is just the tip of the iceberg. More efforts need to be made in Inkster by Council, the Police Department investigative division and the animal control officer. These lawless individuals don’t stop their activities with dog fights. They go hand in hand with drugs, guns and breaking into vacant properties where most of the fights take place. I agree that singling out a particular breed is harsh. Animal behavior reflects the treatment and training they are subjected to. Why not paint this issue with a broader brush and use it for all “dangerous dogs”? But then let’s USE it!!

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Apr 22, 2008 | 8:10 PM
Robert:

Pit Bulls and many other breeds are totally unpredictable. What my aunt thought was a sweet little innocent pitt bull, after 10 years bit it’s first victim wit a sneak attack from behind. That victim was my 2 year old neice that happened to be in her backyard with several other people playing with baby toys. The dog got jealous of her because its owner was paying attention to her and bit her in the neck and was trying to swing her around without release like a rag doll. Good puppie is now dead! There are too many kids in Plymouth for a dog like this not to be totally contained! They are deadly! I love dogs, but I think there should be a low of fence height, security measurments and resposibility to ALL dog owners! Prevent things like this before deadly things can happen to innocent children and adults!

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
New! Talk about more issues in Journal Talk.
Plymouth Journal

Comments (6)

Printer-Friendly

Text Size: A A A A

Contact Us

35540 Michigan Ave.
Wayne, MI 48184

(734) 467-1900


Community event coming up?

List it free!

Communities All Areas Services & Extras About Us