Go to content Go to navigation Go to search
Associated Online

Friday, September 3, 2010 | Archives

September 5, 2008

Canvassers uphold decision in Plymouth Township recount

Plymouth Township Clerk candidate Joe Bridgman is still on the November ballot.

The Wayne County Election Board of Canvassers ruled during a public hearing on Friday that Bridgman defeated Mary Ann Prchlik by a 1,885 to 1,727 margin in the disputed August Republican Primary election.

Prchlik requested the recount, which was conducted by more than a dozen Wayne County election officials. She claimed there were errors in the recording and transferring of votes from machines to poll books that may have cost her the election. The ballot recount was conducted at Plymouth Township Hall.

While the official number of votes tabulated during the recount are different than the 1, 920 to 1, 170 votes totals announced immediately after the Aug. 5 election, the difference of votes was not enough to declare Prchlik the winner.

“This recount affirms the Plymouth Township runs very efficient elections,” said Bridgman, who is currently the deputy clerk of the township. He said the results solidify the competence and reputation of Township Clerk Marilyn Massengill who has taken some heat from the Prchlik campaign over the election results.

“This proves that (she) is top notch in running elections,” Bridgman added.

Massengill said the discrepancies between the Aug 5. totals and numbers calculated by Wayne County elections officials is typical of any challenged elections as “smears and marks” on the ballot may skew the voting machines results. Election officials must recount ballots by hand during recounts.

While refusing to divulge their next course of action the Prchlik campaign voiced their displeasure over more than 1, 670 votes being left out of the recount.

Two precincts within the township had a one-vote discrepancy in the number of ballots cast versus the number of voters logged by township election officials. Under state law, recount officials are forced to accept the results of the Aug. 5 election in those precincts and add it to the recounted votes.

The only exceptions allowed, according to Cynthia Hawthorne, deputy director of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers, are if a “reasonable explanation” is recorded in the voting log to explain the discrepancy or if county canvassers suspected election fraud.
Officials said two missing votes out of more than 3,600 did not meet the standard of fraud.

“The numbers did not match therefore we could not count the precincts,” said Hawthorne.

Massengill, to no avail, contacted Lansing officials to see if anything can be done to count the votes said she is upset that the two precincts were not counted. She added that the missing ballots is a product of human error—not fraud— and is something commonly discovered during recounts.

“Sorry we couldn’t count the two precincts. I really wanted them counted. This is state law, it’s time to change the law,” she said.

http://www.journalgroup.com/Plymouth/8342

Join the Discussion

Reader comments [2]

Sep 6, 2008 | 11:18 AM
VotersUnite.Org:

“This recount affirms the Plymouth Township runs very efficient elections.”

First of all there is a typo in the totals from the original count. 1170 should read 1770.

So the total number of votes counted in the recount was 78 fewer than counted in the original count. What happened to those 78 ballots?

Depending on what the actual count was for the two precincts that weren’t counted these results show somewhere over a 2% error rate which is 200,000 times over the federal guidelines for voting system accuracy.

By law the county cannot use that system until it is tested to ensure it complies.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Sep 7, 2008 | 11:26 AM
Guy Hathaway:

Election employees have one chance to collect, tally and report votes.

That should be enough.

The results of elections are the property of those
who cast the votes until the voters are sure that their votes went to their
intended candidates.

No government employee,
(and certainly no voting
machine vendor employee) has any right to my vote
or yours. If there is a
clear reason to question
the reported results of a
vote, keep this in mind:

Recounts should be done by panels of citizens
chosen by lot from those who participated in the election in question.

A key point: The panel must be statistically representative of all of
the voters; not just the
two “major” parties.

It’s one large step away from disfunctional voting
and one easy step toward
participative democracy.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
New! Talk about more issues in Journal Talk.
Plymouth Journal

Comments (2)

Printer-Friendly

Text Size: A A A A

Contact Us

35540 Michigan Ave.
Wayne, MI 48184

(734) 467-1900


Community event coming up?

List it free!

Communities All Areas Services & Extras About Us
VR Metro - Website Design, Development, Promotion, Hosting and Consulting Company