Go to content Go to navigation Go to search
Associated Online

Thursday, September 2, 2010 | Archives

July 29, 2010

Rumors threaten millage vote


“Nothing travels faster than light-with the possible exception of bad news and rumors,” quoted Romulus Council President Leroy Burcroff Monday night.

Burcroff, who starts his weekly chairperson’s report with a famous quote, referred to the ongoing negative campaign against a city millage that will be on the ballot next Tuesday. The city is seeking a temporary levy of up to 3 mills to help fund police and fire services. If successful, the revenue from the tax increase would alleviate a generally tight budget and allow the city to avoid laying off more than 30 employees.

“Right now, we have a lack of trust in government,” he said.
Even so, he said some people have been spreading misinformation about the millage request in an attempt to get it defeated.

The request is for up to 3 mills for not more than five years, said Burcroff. It would generate about $3 million-which is the budget deficit the city is facing. “The city cannot get a single cent for the millage after that five years,” he said.

He also refuted claims that the mayor, department heads and other non-union employees did not take a pay cut or make concessions on their health care. They took a 5 percent pay cut-Mayor Alan Lambert said the cuts mean he earns about $200 less a week-and pay more toward their health care costs, too. Burcroff said the efforts will save the city about $1 million, annually.

“There are no special deals for the mayor,” he said.
The city has taken other steps to shore up a projected budget deficit, including the elimination of some city services and not hiring employees to fill vacated positions.
He said that anyone that wants information about the budget only needs to ask.
“We’re not trying to hide things from people,” he said.

http://www.journalgroup.com/Romulus/11217

Join the Discussion

Reader comments [7]

Jul 29, 2010 | 11:41 PM
My2cents:

“Mayor Alan Lambert said the cuts mean he earns about $200 less a week”.

So. . . . . . . . the math says his annual salary would be $208,000.

$200 X 52 = $10,400 /.05 = $208,000.

That would be $4,000/week prior to the cut and $3,800/week after the cut?

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Jul 30, 2010 | 10:20 AM
Kathy Ritter:

The City of Romulus Teamsters have a scheduled union meeting for August 2nd. The purpose if the meeting is to vote to ratify the worst contract ever. Tough sell considering 22 of them have pink slips dated for August 9th. 5% wage cut, wage freeze, insurance cuts. Same as non union. When police and fire do the same thing I might consider a yes vote. Until then I will keep what little I have left.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Aug 1, 2010 | 10:01 AM
Ron Orr:

transparency is different if the information is available for the public to seek it out. whereas the publics definition of transparency is a big/little picture of the whole situation. provided to all voters in many forms. we have a tough 5 years here and we all want the whole picture for the comment that the city is low on mills compared to the rest of the cities is not an excuse to raise more money or we would have done this when times were good.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Aug 1, 2010 | 12:40 PM
Tim Leary:

Lambert, you and the council need to wake up, we all know a 5% pay cut is worthless after the raises you gave yourselves, and with all the empty homes in romulus ( i cant help but think a good portion of these are related to the blocked airport acquisition by Lambert) we don’t really need all the firefighters , policemen and council members now , do we ?Lambert, you’re greed should shock me, but , it doesn’t in this age of lying politicians , that’s sad , vote no , keep your money in your pockets

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Aug 2, 2010 | 4:09 PM
Friend of the DPW.:

Not the same as non-union
5% CUT TO RETIREMENT
13 furlow days = 5% pay cut
that’s 10%, five more percent that non-union not counting having take a lower paying posistion.The average union employee is going to lose around $90 a week with the cuts and if they get bump back could lose another $80 that $170 per week, thats on a $42,000 a year job not counting insurance how is that fair the mayor’s giving $200 a week on his salary and Joe Blow at the DPW is giving up $170

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Aug 4, 2010 | 1:00 PM
Bob Wetzel:

Now are you greedy politicians going to wake up, take a real paycut , and maybe , just realize , maybe, you might be in the unemployment line when your terms are up

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
Aug 8, 2010 | 1:06 PM
CFRC:

In a previous article (http://www.journalgroup.com/Romulus/11217/rumors-threaten-millage-vote) it was stated that Mayor Lambert would be taking a 5% pay cut which would lower his weekly salary $200. If you read this article from 2006 (http://www.journalgroup.com/Romulus/403/mayor-pension-flap-is-unfounded), it states that his newly raised salary is $90,000/yr. A 5% pay cut would actually lower his salary around $86/wk. That’s a big difference from $200 per week. Citizens of Romulus need to start doing homework themselves and not just listening to rhetoric and taking that as truth. Take back your city and see what is needed to get through the difficult times so that there can be a prosperous future. Do a bit of investigating and actually show up to Council meetings and votes.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
New! Talk about more issues in Journal Talk.
Communities All Areas Services & Extras About Us
VR Metro - Website Design, Development, Promotion, Hosting and Consulting Company