Go to content Go to navigation Go to search

Wednesday, August 20, 2008 | Archives

April 17, 2008

Ballot issue will help retirees, reduce costs

Voters in Wayne will have a chance to help out city retirees and put some money back in the municipal coffers at the same time on May 6.

That’s when they’ll vote on two proposals to switch current retirees from the City of Wayne Retirement System to the Municipal Employee Retirement System (MERS).

“It’s as close to a no-brainer as you can get,” said Robert English, assistant city manager. “We’ve not asking residents for money, we’re asking them if they want us to save money.”

The city has worked toward shifting all employee groups to the MERS system as a cost savings measure. English has headed up the efforts.

MERS is a statewide organization that handles retirement benefits for municipal workers. More than 700 municipalities throughout the state take part in it, English said.

“It does not make much fiscal sense to maintain our stand alone system if we can join up with 700 other municipalities,” English said. “You can get better rates, better interest.”

English said he already has letters of agreement from several city bargaining units to make the switch, including the firefighters’ association, dispatchers, Department of Public Works and Parks and Recreation, the general employees association, the supervisor’s association and the district court. Still outstanding are the Command Officers Association (COAM) and the Patrol Officers Association (POAM). English said he hopes to have agreements with them soon. He estimated that, if every group switches, it could save the city more than $100,000 every year.

The reason voters have to weigh in on the issue is because the retirement system is charter-based, not ordinance based. If it were an ordinance-based system, it would only require a vote from the city council.

English said the city will save staff time, too. When someone wants to retire now, he has to get involved as well as the clerk, finance director and assistant finance director. MERS handles all those details.

The change wouldn’t mean any reduction of benefits, either. The Michigan constitution guarantees that.

“Nobody’s benefits are being diminished,” English said.

The city has a mill dedicated to fund the retirement packages of city employees, but it does not entirely cover the costs. The remainder of the funds are taken each year from the general fund, according to English.

“Those numbers go up every year That’s why we’re trying to do this,” he said.

The only differences retirees would see is that they will be paid on the 18th of every month rather than the first; their payments would be electronically transmitted to their bank accounts and they would receive Cost of Living Adjustments on January 1 rather than July 1.

“It’s pretty straightforward,” English said. “There are just some procedural differences.”

It also has an advantage for current employees in that their benefits will transfer should they take another job.

English said once retirees knew they wouldn’t lose any benefits, they were all behind the plan, too.

“All the feedback I’ve had has been positive,” he said. “There has been no retiree that has spoken against MERS.”

http://www.journalgroup.com/Wayne/7462

Join the Discussion

Reader comments [1]

Apr 18, 2008 | 12:42 PM
D:

As a Wayne retiree I get really nervous when the city messes with the retirement system. Mr. English said he would keep us informed of any issues surrounding our retirement. Finding out about this election by other nervous, anxious retirees and in a newpaper article isn’t keeping us informed. The Retirement Board minutes are not posted on the City’s website so I can’t inform myself. Depending on nonresponsive administrators for info is futile. Everyone wants to save money. But is this savings REAL or PROJECTED? Is MERS promising on speculation? And what if the City wants out of MERS? We have a retirement board that I would think could handle the issues defined in this election. Why go to the expense of an election? And there’s another issue not addressed regarding the difference in paydate. What about that? Mr English would have the voters believe that the retiress are all warm and fuzzy about this change. Not so. He failed to mention all the anxiety and fear and mistrust we expressed that day he said he would surely keep us informed of issues surrounding MERS. What about leaving the retirees alone and put all the current employees in MERS who negotiated this change in exchange for a benefit? The retirees will receive nothing for this change. We’ve already experienced having our benefits plundered. So why not really help us and give us back the insurance benefits the city stole? Then leave the retirees in the retirement system as the Charter intended. Promises made are promises broken like the Mayor promising an annual retiree meeting 2 years ago. I’ve not receive a notice of such a meeting. I feel like an unarmed man in a frontier shoot-out.

Add a Comment | Link to This | Back to Top
New! Talk about more issues in Journal Talk.
Communities All Areas Services & Extras About Us